Sesame Summit 2026 – application open

10 solutions to bridge the gap between VCs and events

Investors are fixtures at tech conferences, but there’s no lack of misunderstandings between event organizers and venture capital firms’ platform staff. At Sesame Summit 2025, we got them to talk to each other on how this collaboration could go more smoothly.

At Sesame Summit 2024, we uncovered unspoken issues between venture investors and event organizers. For example, organizers often resent VCs hosting side events that don’t benefit the main conference, yet many VCs, even at last year’s Biarritz event, didn’t realize this. Do VCs really need events to source deals anymore? Do organizers actually read speaker application forms? And are diversity panels helping anyone, or just ticking boxes?

So at Sesame Summit 2025, we did something rare. We put VC teams and event organizers in the same room and asked: How can we smooth out the bumps in this relationship?

Led by futurist Henry Coutinho-Mason, startup event wizard Austė Šilkaitytė, and myself, our goal wasn’t to run yet another panel. We set out to crowdsource a set of working principles — a Ten Commandments-style field guide — for anyone navigating the murky waters of content, capital and curation.


🧠 What event organizers really think

1. Events aren’t Glassdoor — but maybe they should be
What if event organizers had a private rating system to assess which VCs are actually engaging, insightful speakers, and which ones ghost last minute or bring recycled content? The idea of a VC “Glassdoor” for speaking slots raised some eyebrows… and a few smirks.

2. Don’t overestimate speaker application forms
Events rarely source speakers via application forms. VC staff can see some success by suggesting speakers via application forms, but it’s unlikely to result in a speaking engagement for most events. For example, speaker submissions may work better for smaller events than for larger ones, which mostly rely on curating the list of speakers, not inbound interest. 

3. Think beyond sales: Investor Relations is the way to go
Several organizers agreed on this point. Having a dedicated IR person to manage VC relationships is now essential, not just to land deals, but to build and foster lasting trust and relationships. Think investor relations, not logo hunting.

4. Ask VCs what they really want
Top event organizers shared a nugget that may help newcomers: Venture investors have different goals that events can help them achieve, and it’s not always dealflow. They may be looking for limited partners, seek to recruit, satisfy their FOMO, or build their brand. But if you don’t ask, you won’t know. That’s where the value chain breaks down.

5. Smaller is smarter
It’s not all about mega-stages, especially when it comes to aligning with VC goals. Events should explore curated formats to connect VCs with other asset managers — think LP-GP dinners, Family Office lunches, or side events with Business Angels and PE firms.


💼 What VCs really think

6. “We should probably pay more often”
Yep, someone actually said it. VCs should pay, especially for side events and private meetings that piggyback on an event. The organizers and event deserve some of the benefit, too. Respect the work, fund the ecosystem.

7. “We could prep our speakers better”
Too many VC firms send associates or partners to panels unbriefed. It shows. If you want to be on stage, prep like it matters.

8. “We know where the editorial gold is”
Venture firms and investors know which companies are the hottest before anyone else, and that also applies to their portfolio. If they can help events access the best of the best before their big news breaks, it’s a win-win for the programming, the VCs, their portfolio firms and the press alike. 

9. “Enough with the diversity panels”
Female investors shouldn’t only be invited to “Women in VC” panels or as moderators. Invite them to talk about their actual field of expertise. 

10. “Have an opinion, or stay off stage”
This is one thing that VC comms folk wish their partners would hear: The best speakers aren’t neutral; they’re bold. Speakers who challenge the room are remembered. The ones who say what everyone already knows? Not so much.

blank

🤖 The visual breakthrough

One of the unexpected highlights of this event were a few AI-generated visual metaphors that were produced in real-time using Henry’s VisuAIze system based on anonymous sketches.

Instead of Post-it chaos, we got instant clarity — and laughs.

“Using AI visuals made tackling tough topics accessible, even fun,” Henry shared in his LinkedIn post. “People could share anonymously, mistakes broke the ice, and even awkward truths felt easier to explore.”

blank

This wasn’t just showing off tech for its sake. These visualizations shifted the whole tone of the workshop to a memorable experience.

blank

For instance, this picture above is telling: VC firms are often frustrated with how frequently event programming teams’ junior staff changes. Hence their ask: At least send a handover email.


🧩 Who was in the room?

Events: 4YFN, Arctic15, DigitalK, France Digitale, How to Web, JEC World, Oslo Innovation Week, SXSW, TechChill, Techarena, Tomorrowland/Love Tomorrow, VivaTech, Web Summit.

VCs: Brighteye, daphni, Elaia, Karma Ventures, Partech, Revaia, Samaipata, Serena, Target Global, Ventech, and others.

blank

🎯 What happens next?

Of course, we’re all still figuring this relationship out. But one thing’s obvious: better collaboration starts with transparency about expectations, incentives, and the goals that go beyond stage time and sponsor logos.

So here’s our call to action for VCs and events alike:

  • Events: Invest in real investor relations. Ask better questions. Say no more often.
  • VCs: Treat events like strategic partners, not vendors. Show up with intent. And bring your wallet, not just your presence.

We’ll keep refining these “Ten Commandments” with the Sesamers community. But for now, let’s stop playing the same old game and build something better, together.

you might also like

Fundraising 5 hours ago

London-based AI laboratory Ineffable Intelligence has emerged from stealth with a $1.1 billion seed round at a $5.1 billion post-money valuation, the company confirmed on 27 April 2026. The financing is the largest seed round ever raised by a European company and one of the largest first-money-in rounds in the global history of artificial intelligence. The round was co-led by Sequoia Capital and Lightspeed Venture Partners. Participating investors included Nvidia, DST Global, Index Ventures, Google, and the UK Sovereign AI Fund, the British government’s recently established vehicle for backing strategic AI capacity on home soil. A bet on a different path to general intelligence Ineffable Intelligence was founded in 2025 by David Silver, the former Vice President of Reinforcement Learning at Google DeepMind and the principal architect of AlphaGo, AlphaZero and AlphaStar. He is joined by three further DeepMind alumni: Wojciech Czarnecki, Lasse Espeholt and Junhyuk Oh. All four have spent the past decade at the frontier of reinforcement learning research, the discipline behind some of the most consequential demonstrations of machine learning over the past ten years. The company describes its objective as building a “superlearner” — an AI system capable of acquiring knowledge directly from its own experience rather than from human-generated text or imagery. “Our mission is to make first contact with superintelligence,” Silver said in a statement accompanying the launch. “We are creating a superlearner that discovers all knowledge from its own experience, from elementary motor skills through to profound intellectual breakthroughs.” The framing is a deliberate departure from the dominant industry trajectory. Most leading AI laboratories, including OpenAI, Anthropic and Google DeepMind itself, have built large language models trained primarily on the corpus of the internet, then refined that training with human feedback. Ineffable’s wager is that the marginal returns on scaling text-based pretraining are diminishing and that the next leap in capability will come from agents that learn endlessly from the consequences of their own actions, in much the same way AlphaZero learnt the game of Go without studying any human matches. Why $1.1 billion at seed The size of the round is unusual even by the inflated standards of the 2026 AI capital cycle. Two factors appear to explain it. First, frontier reinforcement learning at the scale Ineffable describes is computationally extraordinarily expensive: the company will need to operate vast simulation environments and train very large models against them, an undertaking that consumes capital at a rate closer to physical R&D than to traditional software. Second, the round signals a strategic move by Europe’s investor and policy ecosystems to retain the most ambitious AI researchers on the continent. The presence of the UK Sovereign AI Fund alongside Sequoia, Lightspeed and Nvidia is the clearest expression of that intent. The British government has publicly framed the investment as a bet on breakthrough AI that “can discover new knowledge”, positioning the country as a willing co-investor in domestic frontier laboratories. For Ineffable, the implication is access not only to capital but to compute, regulatory engagement and the still-resilient academic talent base around UCL, Oxford, Cambridge and Imperial. Founder pledge of historic scale Alongside the funding announcement, Silver disclosed that he is committing 100 per cent of any personal proceeds from his Ineffable equity to charity via the Founders Pledge network — described by the organisation as the largest pledge in its history. At the round’s $5.1 billion valuation, that commitment could ultimately exceed several billion dollars if the company succeeds. It is a meaningful gesture in a sector where the reputational stakes around concentrated AI wealth are escalating, and one likely to be referenced in subsequent founder-led commitments. Implications for the European AI landscape Ineffable’s emergence reshapes the European AI map in three concrete ways. It establishes London as the home of the continent’s largest-ever seed-stage company, complicating Paris’s recent narrative of frontier-AI primacy after Mistral’s earlier rounds. It validates a thesis — that reinforcement learning, not transformer scaling, is the next frontier — that has lately been losing capital share to language-model incumbents. And it confirms that the UK government is now willing to act as a balance-sheet co-investor in domestic AI laboratories, a posture much closer to the French model than to the predominantly grant-based regimes elsewhere in Europe. The execution risk is non-trivial. Reinforcement learning at frontier scale has historically required years of careful environment design before producing competitive systems, and Ineffable’s “first contact” framing sets a high bar against which it will be judged. But for now, with a billion dollars on the balance sheet, four of the discipline’s most accomplished researchers in the founding team and a sovereign co-investor at its back, Ineffable Intelligence is the most heavily resourced new entrant in the European AI cycle. Sesamers covers European fundraising rounds across deeptech, fintech and AI. Source: tech.eu.

Fundraising 5 days ago

Belfast's Cloudsmith has raised $72M Series C led by TCV, with Insight Partners participating, to expand its artifact management platform and secure the AI-era software supply chain.

Fundraising 5 days ago

Berlin’s VREY has raised €3.3M seed led by Rubio Impact Ventures to roll out rooftop solar software for Germany’s multi-family buildings.

Subscribe to
our Newsletter!

Stay at the forefront with our curated guide to the best upcoming Tech events.